Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Noble Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:37, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The Noble Collection

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability Happy-melon 12:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Happy-melon 12:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be notable enough, and a quick Google News archive search found a number of print sources. What exactly is wrong with it? Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per Starblind. Noble Collection is a notable producer of replica props, particularly film props.  They do produce a published catalog which I personally still get every few months or so and have seen them at other places as well.  Article is a stub, but still worth keeping. --Trippz 07:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sorry to say I do not find any notablity in the article.Harlowraman 02:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - in answer to the question above, what is wrong with it is that it fails WP:V, the over-riding policy, by having no reliable sources. It also needs to have a sourced assertion of notability. If some reviews, from reliable publications, can be added to the article attesting to notability then I should be happy to change my view. TerriersFan 04:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I could care less if there is a United States corporation stub on this, a bit off my personal interest trek, but if we are seeking completeness it should remain. It is a WP:V company, which seems to be the only thing the article asserts.  Just a simple Google sends back a multitude of unique hits.  [], [], Barnes & Noble sells their merchandise [] and Amazon as well []. I don't know if you are seeking some kind of corporate review, but there are tons of product reviews.  Heres one [.  Of course, many of the reviews found online are embeded into storefronts, blogs, etc., but they are there.  As I said, I could care less, but there is a lot out there, just do a Google and you'll see.  I personally don't see anything wrong (requiring deletion, that is) with the stub, don't think it could be merged either, but to delete it seems inappropriate as well if we are seeking completion. As for the Schwarz toy store in New York City, I can't verify, but I wouldn't be surprised considering the prices they charge for this junk.  Do any of those satisfy?  --[[User:Trippz|Trippz]] 08:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Starblind, I'd like to see these apparent sources. My Gnews search found nothing.  G iggy\Talk 07:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.