Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nodd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

The Nodd

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced. No real claim to notability. Competition does not appear major, band appears to have only placed in regional section. Duffbeerforme (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete As per Duffbeerforme's commentsTheseeker4 (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Band is just notable enough to justify inclusion. I found some write ups on them and I think an article is not inappropriate given this band's history and some success. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - One of the qriteups is a college paper. And the Playphilly article is extemely short.  Not quite enough to pass the notability bar for me.  Note that the text of the current article is copied from their myspace page and needs to be reverted back to a non-copyvio version if the article is kept. -- Whpq (talk) 02:35, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep because this band has had enough minor success and coverage to justify inclusion, in my opinion. The article needs to be rewritten, of course. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Whpq. Myspace is not reliable. The collegian paper is a student paper, therefore not reliable also. Others are just minor mentioning of the group's name. If editors can show more reliable sources, independent ones, and not trivial mentioning, then I'll change my opinion. Dekisugi (talk) 07:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability established the usual way. No reason to override the usual standards here.  We all dislike spammy band articles - but this isn't an instance of that. Wily D  12:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Media coverage trivial for the most part. Fails WP:MUSIC. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  20:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.