Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:28, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

The Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd.
nom&vote delete. Random bank vanity. no criteria for notability. Gaff talk 04:22, 15 October 2005 (UTC) Stiking through my prior and changing vote to to keep.--Gaff talk  08:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete  Molotov    (talk)  [[Image:Caranimationforvmolotov.gif|25px]]   04:29, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Eight billion dollars (US) in assets, a division of a vast financial comglomerate (Nomura Holdings, Inc.: I believe one of their divisions owns 6,000-8,000 pubs in the UK). Not the largest bank in Japan or Asia (ranked #191 in Asia, according to Asiaweek), but still worth at least a short article. And what the hell is "bank vanity", anyways? --Calton | Talk 05:45, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Calton. Maybe some info from the japanese entry could be transwikied --Anetode 05:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All banks are worthy of articles in Wikipedia. Fg2 06:50, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Cool, I'll get started on First International Bank of AMIB's article, then. Hey, anyone wanna deposit any money? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 09:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I suspect setting up a legal bank may be slightly more complex a procedure than that. Average Earthman 19:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, a legal bank. You need to specify these things. ;D - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 20:27, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand, as per Calton. Carioca 06:54, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as notable Asian bank. Verifiable sources so meets guidelines for articles on corporations. Capitalistroadster 06:56, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as a major bank. Banks aren't typical subjects of vanity articles. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 09:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep- Notable bank stub with potentials for growth. --Bhadani 10:24, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Not vanity. CalJW 11:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --TimPope 09:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely notable. Needs to be expanded bigtime. - Sensor 03:08, 20 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.