Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nostril Picker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Closing as a Soft Deletion as most of the commentators and even the nominator seem ambivalent about this film's notability. Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

The Nostril Picker

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Possibly a non-notable film. The only reference is to IMDB. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment found one RS review at HorrorNews . Needs one more review for WP:NFILM Donald D23   talk to me  23:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment: I found a review of sorts from Sight & Sound. Can't really access it, so I don't know how in-depth it is, but it seems like it's on the slim side. On the other hand, the fact that the magazine even covered the film at all is kind of amazing. There's B movies, Z grade flicks, Asylum creations... and then there's this film. What I have found about it in various non-usable outlets discuss it like it's kind of a "wow, they actually made this" type of movie. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment, it has an entry in Spinegrinder: The Movies Most Critics Won’t Write About but I can't see the actual page. Most entries in the book are one or two paragraphs only. SpinningSpark 10:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I have access to the Sight & Sound review and can confirm that it's not in-depth enough to constitute sigcov. (If anyone would like to see it, feel free to email me and I'll send a copy.) I think the entry in Spinegrinder is just a mention on a list of horror movies filmed in Michigan, so it doesn't seem to be in-depth either. There's a review in Vox, but it's only two sentences (including a comment that the film "is too inept to be either offensive or even remotely entertaining"); it's also in an article in The Guardian on "The worst film titles in the world", which describes it with only a single word: "nauseating". The HorrorNews review is fine, but without additional significant coverage, the film doesn't quite seem to be notable. Glad to reconsider if there's something I'm missing. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.