Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Obsessed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 11:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The Obsessed
Non notable band, attempted CSDA7 and was rejected MECU ≈ talk 20:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Possible bad faith nomination, as someone clearly has something against Southern Lord Records (see user's other nominations and mass-tagging (almost tag per minute) with db-a7). From user's reply on my talk page: I was asked by an admin on IRC to go through Southern Lord Records and mark the ones I didn't feel made it. Many of the speedy tags added by this user were ridiculous and might have qualified for abuse of tags.   Seems like a case of Speedy keep. I'll try to reference these articles later, but there are 18 of them so it will take some time. Prolog 20:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - dposse 23:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This band is extremely important in the doom metal genre. It features Scott Weinrich who was in Saint Vitus, another doom metal pioneer. It also features members of Goatsnake, Kyuss and The Melvins, the latter two being extremely influential bands as well.Olliegrind 02:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly meets WP:MUSIC solely by discography.  SkierRMH, 07:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 07:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, important due to membership and discography, meets WP:MUSIC. --Eastlaw 08:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:MUSIC. - Peregrine Fisher 22:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This page has mirror pages on both the Italian and Portugese Wikipedias.Olliegrind 03:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.