Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Offspring's ninth studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete.  Hammer time, indeed. Jclemens (talk) 00:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

The Offspring's ninth studio album
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates Crystal ball. Things like "...he would like to have the new album out in 2010, but the band isn't likely to hit the studio until January." don't really indicate that this is currently a scheduled event and shows little in the way of notability at this time. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 17:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. The history part is also a copyvio.  Triplestop  x3  17:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  --  The  left orium  18:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No tracklisting, name or release date? Then here comes the hammer. (Seriously - one of the blokes in the band says they don't have any songs yet.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  19:29, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's no track list, not to mention no name. WP:CRYSTAL. talking  birds  19:42, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Speculation. Albums that aren't titled and/or haven't been recorded yet don't need an article. Alex (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Stop...WP:HAMMER time (delete). As I noted when I prodded it a few weeks ago: "WP:NALBUMS: Article about a possible future album that's only rumors at this point and about which no significant details (tracks, recording dates, etc.) have been announced (none exist, as at this point the band are only discussing tentative plans to write & record at some point in the next year). No objection to this being speedily deleted." --IllaZilla (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.