Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Omicron Conspiracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. EVERYTHING film-related is on IMDB.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

The Omicron Conspiracy
Nothing on Google, nothing on IMDB. -- Curps 23:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

It seems to me that since the film is still to be made, no details of it would be released to the general public, particularly due to the controversy surrounding it -- James Sack 00:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC) I guess it's your choice what you keep and what you don't. I have carefully avoided the issue of Notability in Wikipedia Fiction. Personally, I wouldn't rate this article as "Fancruft", and have carefully stayed away from that. I would also argue that due to issures raised recently about public spending in Britain, this is an article that contains importance and notability. Anyway, Fancruft is not a reason to simply to delete an article, unless it is "poorly written" or "POV" and I believe my article is balanced and written in understandable prose Earl Flinn 09:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Please check the website again - it works fine, and in the section on actors lists Adrian Bell, and mentions his work on "The Omicron Conspircy". 172.188.83.253 12:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a crystal ball Josh Parris #: 01:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the existence of this thing isn't even verified. The referenced website gives me a 404, and a Google search on that site for 'omicron' comes up with nothing. --Last Malthusian 11:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * "The Angles Theatre Website will be online shortly. Please visit us again soon." Even if it does come back up, I don't have high hopes that this will get past crystal ball status. --Last Malthusian 13:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I guess we'll have to see. 172.188.83.253 13:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Doesn't crystal ball status refer to future predictions? Whereas, this article isn't really about future predictions, but about the problems surrounding the creation of this film - I mean, the article is about the actual process or creatin the film as much as the film itself, I'd be inclined to argue Earl Flinn 15:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.