Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Only Difference Between Martyrdom And Suicide Is Press Coverage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 13:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The Only Difference Between Martyrdom And Suicide Is Press Coverage
Unnotable single by Panic! at the Disco. Song was radio only single (no CD, vinyl or special digital download releases), doesn't even have a music video. Article includes no information not already supplied by A Fever You Can't Sweat Out (album article). Should be deleted. HarryCane 19:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - article seems to have content, and it is from a notable band. The JPS talk to me  19:25, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Article does have content, yes. Chart positions that can be found in the Panic! at the Disco article and the title origin which can be found on A Fever You Can't Sweat Out. Other than that there is zero information whatsoever. --HarryCane 11:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Being released without a physical single is not uncommon. And it actually did get released as a digital download, perhaps not a special one, but then, none of the tracks on this particular album were released as "special" downloads. Keep as top ten single (U.S. Modern Rock) by reasonably notable artist. GassyGuy 20:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Exactly my point. None of the singles from this band are specially notable. As far as I'm informed, the song wasn't even released as a single digital download, just as part of the album. The other singles at least have CD/vinyl releases and music videos to "flesh out" the articles. This one, however, is complete. There is no more information that can be given on this song/single (except for maybe on what compilation albums it was released, but that's nothing to go in an encyclopedia). And charting top 5 in the Modern Rock charts is not that strong of a criteria to justify this weak article. --HarryCane 11:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, the proposed Notability_%28songs%29 would cover this song. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep songs that chart. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep you may never now if it will become a hit or something. --Cory pratt 10:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep any singles --Demon Hog 17:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep It charted, it did something, it was a single. Totally notable. -- *kate speak 08:33, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as a Top 5-charting single on a major singles chart. There could be more info in the article, but I would encourage you to add more to it rather than try to delete an article that others could certainly add to and make Wikipedia better. 70.185.165.183 04:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: You see, currently, there is nothing more to add to the article. And it's a fallacy that every top 10 single on a major singles chart needs to have an article. It's a criteria for it to be allowed to have an article. Major difference. I'm just saying that this article is very superfluous, as it consists of random facts copied from the other two articles I mentioned, and it will never make it past stub-stadium. --HarryCane 10:41, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Article only around for 1 1/2 month. Give it a chance to develop.  This band does not seem to have devoted wiki fans filling in gaps like other bands, but that does not un-include this song from Modern Rock chart Hackajar 11:13, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.