Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Only Reason


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Only Reason

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC, because there are no independent reviews of this song nor has it ever charted. Someone posted incorrect information about this song allegedly charting on the Billboard Hot 100, but my search on billboard.com yields that that info was false. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 19:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, didn't chart, will likely be undone if redirected. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC.&mdash;Kww(talk) 20:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Digital single by a notable artist. It has an accompanying music video and was released on a compilation album. Soprano90 (talk) 21:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Read WP:NSONGS. Not all works by a notable artist are inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:30, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Question about redirecting: If this song is so non-notable it can't be even mentioned in the Lil Wayne article, where can we redirect it then? --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 22:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It can be redirected to the artist. I was just wary about doing that since song redirects tend to be undone very, very quickly and we'd just go through the same thing all over again. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. It fails WP:NSONGS. Tim  meh  ! ( review me ) 00:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.