Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oracle and the Mountains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. The creator is right, I should have done research before tagging it. It's not entirely my fault, considering the article creator didn't provide any sources. If the creator provided sources, it wouldn't have been prodded or sent to AFD. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 18:23, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

The Oracle and the Mountains

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. The reason I gave in the prod was "No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BK." Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 18:04, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose As I said in the talk page, if Schuym had even bothered to do research rather that slap a VFD on it after less than a minute, he would have been able to find that it does not, in fact, fail notability. The story has been "multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself": the three volumes of The Dark Tower Concordance by Robin Furth, The Road to the Dark Tower by Bev Vincent, and the two Marvel Comics guides. Also, I would say that Stephen King is "is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable" seeing as literally all of his other short stories and works have articles on Wikipedia. This should not be an exception. But the bottom line is that Schuym put a VFD on it before he could possibly have verified it one way or another. Kuralyov (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.