Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Order of the Black Venus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  13:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The Order of the Black Venus

 * — (View AfD)

Delete, article of non-notable organization appears to rely completely on self-published sources. Tunnels of Set 05:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ORG and WP:V, 6 non-wiki ghits. MER-C 07:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:ORG, and lacks any reliable sources to show notability. Jayden54 13:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORG and virtually nothing on Google. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - I completely fail to understand the reference to WP:V. The organization has petitioned the Estonian Government for official recognition as a religious community, a matter clearly on the record, and inherently verifieable. In addition, has published a book with broad national distribution, another strike against WP:V applicability. As to WP:ORG the society clearly has international scope, so that one is missed by a mile too. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 11:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Disregarded, From WP:ORG – Organizations are usually notable if the scope of activities are national or international in scale and information can be verified by a third party source. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  13:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.