Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Original Bootleg Series from the Manticore Vaults: Volume One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep Album from Emerson, Lake & Palmer is notable, now page is not a mess, keep. --Stefan talk 13:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

The Original Bootleg Series from the Manticore Vaults: Volume One

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem notable. Appears like a list. Phgao 13:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. The current content is so incomprehensible as to obscure what the subject in question really is. Van Tucky  Talk 22:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per VanTucky's explanation. Icestorm815 02:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree, as per my own notice. Phgao 14:55, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: although poorly formatted, this is an official album release by a notable band. Bondegezou 19:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, but what notable band? Per WP:BAND, this article fails notability criteria by lacking any significant coverage in reliable sources. Not only that, but it's totally incomprehensible. Van Tucky  Talk 20:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an album by Emerson, Lake & Palmer: I agree the page is a mess, but it's a real album. I think I even own it... unless I've got Volume Two. I'll try to do clean-up. Bondegezou 20:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Me again. Probably the most sensible thing long term is to have a The Original Bootleg Series From The Manticore Vaults article that covers all the releases. Bondegezou 09:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Me, yet again. I've done some work on this page: it certainly needs more work, but it's no longer incomprehensible gibberish. Might I suggest those who earlier proprosed speedy deletes take a look at the revised page...? Bondegezou 09:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.