Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The P4 Language Consortium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted as G12 - violation of the copyright policy.. — Diannaa (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

The P4 Language Consortium

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The current references are trivial mentions (ref 1, ref 2 (mainly covering the processor, not this organisation), ref 5), non-SIGCOV database, or routine WP:NORG failing routine announcements primarily quotes. Therefore, WP:NORG is failed, WP:BEFORE did not find additional sources contributing to notability, only routine announcements as well (see my previous PROD rationale). The article is also promotional, e.g., The main purpose of The P4 Language Consortium is to create a thriving open source community to perfect the P4 language and encourage its widespread adoption to design network systems.  VickKiang  (talk)  00:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  VickKiang   (talk)  00:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete seems like page was created in violation of WP:NOTADVOCACY BrigadierG (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete agree with the promotional tone explained above. I only find articles on how P4 fits into the "larger tech landscape" and "drives inovation bla bla". Oaktree b (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I watched the video at the link in the URL, looked over the content and sources here. I do not believe that there is anything about this article that fully meets notability guidelines, and the advocacy point is well grounded in my opinion. TY — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 01:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.