Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pan Pacific Singapore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Peacent 02:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

The Pan Pacific Singapore

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom to list separately the various hotels bundled together in an earlier nomination. Rationale for deletion remains insufficient notability and of no encyclopedic value (see WP:NOT). Pascal.Tesson 19:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep -- "Travel guides. An article on Paris should mention landmarks such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of your favorite hotel or the price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Such details are, however, very welcome at Wikitravel, but note that due to license incompatibility you cannot copy content wholesale unless you are the copyright holder." -- this is the relevant passage on WP:NOT pasted wholesale. Please explain how you use the guideline to support your conclusions. Or have I looked at the wrong guideline? Could you also please elaborate on the "procedural norm"? I understand that there exists the Pan Pacific article, but then this will be more a case of merging. Moreover, for the hotels which you have tagged for deletion but do not belong to a chain, what then? Are standalone hotels inherently not notable? Context is key, but one must be apprised of the context, rather than overestimating its visitation, of which the latter is unnecessary since the relevant articles set out the context already. Chensiyuan 01:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The Pan Pacific Hotel is the tallest building in Marina Centre, and has been a prominent building since its completion. Its architectural merit far outstrips the notability of its usage as a hotel, even thou its flagship restaurant also happens to be reknown locally.--Huaiwei 10:52, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, enough said. &mdash;Sengkang 15:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and admonish nominator in the interests of fighting systemic bias. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 12:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.