Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Patel Theory of a Negative Hole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

The Patel Theory of a Negative Hole

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Smells like WP:OR. Command and Conquer Expert! speak to me...review me... 06:56, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORIGINAL - page was created by a user with a name similar to the author of the theory. It's clearly orignal research. Inks.LWC (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research per WP:OR and as the above. The references provided don't support the claims made in the theory. §everal⇒|Times 16:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Original research. SL93 (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:OR, WP:FRINGE, probably WP:MADEUP. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * delete&mdash;the scherezade theory of a positive hole proves that time and space are wasted by this article and it will be a net positive force on wikipedia should this fall into a hole. (meaning per above, of course)&mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Doesn't appear to be covered in reliable sources. Northamerica1000 (talk) 01:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per original PROD: concern = Seems to be original research violating WP:ORIGINAL. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete—none of the sources suggest this isn't completely made up by the author. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 19:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - have to agree with everyone here. As stated previously, the article is violation of WP:OR and probably WP:MADEUP. Chris (talk) 20:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No scholar hits, books hits, etc.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear WP:OR. Academic searches show nothing. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.