Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Peel Sessions (The Cure album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  14:06, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

The Peel Sessions (The Cure album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

unable to establish this as Wikipedia-notable/deserving of an article outside of an AllMusic review Lachlan Foley 06:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was a number 7 hit on the UK Indie Chart. It would have been reviewed in the weekly music press at the time. --Michig (talk) 06:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Michig - David Gerard (talk) 13:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ σ  ς . (Sigma) 08:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)




 * Keep - The Peel Sessions as whole definitely have received coverage (for example see ). There is currently no separate article for the sessions as whole, as it instead redirects to John Peel.  I'd argue that the sessions themselves have independent notability and deserve a separate article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.