Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Petek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Na Nach Nachma Nachman Meuman. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 08:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

The Petek

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article fails WP:Notability, does not cite secondary sources, receives no Google hits other than nanach websites, and appears to be an attempt to assign importance to the disputed teachings of Rabbi Yisroel Ber Odesser and his Na Nach movement. Mention of "the petek" is already included in Na Nach Nachma Nachman Meuman. Yoninah (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC) As the founder of this page, I readily agree to have it merged with the Na Nach Nachma page, but I don't know how to do it, so invite one of you to do it. About secondary sources: The article clearly states that the Petek is just a claim of Rabbi Yisroel Ber Odesser, that means one either believes it or doesn't, there can be discussion of pro's and con's, but obviously there is no need for secondary sources! Two editors advised to merge the article, why does yonina want to delete it, why does he catigoricly (sorry for the spelling it's almost Shabos here) delete my work?Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun (talk) 13:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge Merge into Na Nach Nachma Nachman Meuman where it belongs. Avi (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge as per above. Joe407 (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.