Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pharmer's Almanac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phishheads. Jenks24 (talk) 03:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

The Pharmer's Almanac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK - could easily be summarized in a section in the Phish article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Lockhart Steele, where it is covered re: one of its authors. No major reviews or coverage specific to the book, but I haven't scoured offline reference materials. czar  14:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Steele remains a fine target but I expanded Phishheads, where all of the fan-made books can be covered by reliable sources. Redirect there as an alternative to deletion. czar  21:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 ( c ) (m)   04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , would the redirect be a suitable outcome for you? czar  05:37, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like we're in agreement czar  06:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect, nom is correct, there's no justification for a separate article here, and a brief mention is all that is needed. Same goes for the similar Phish items here at AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phishheads as the first choice, Phish as second choice. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  01:15, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.