Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Piccadilly Rats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Given uncontested sources Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

The Piccadilly Rats

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability. Further, the author has stated that he has a connection with the band  as their manager, and despite a  friendly note from me  has refused to declare his COI and has  accused me of tampering  with that article on my talk page. Suggest deletion of this article, although the band manager (whos also the author of this article, by his own admission) means well, Wikipedia is not the place to publicize your band.  Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ  14:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

 References  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment – Below are some source examples. Additional sources are available online. North America1000 09:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: For the last time to invite comments on the sources mentioned above.
 * Comment: There needs to be actual discussion for this to be deleted, if there is none, it will probably have to be closed as no consensus. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 13:12, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yashtalk stalk 08:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - I was about to close this as no consensus due to lack of discussion and be done with it, but as it's just been relisted, I'll make my opinion official. Sources indicate local notability; in my opinion that's good enough. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG.  d.g. L3X1  (distant write)  18:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.