Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pleasure Syndicate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Pleasure Syndicate

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. While members of this group may be notable, the group itself is not. Not even the (now removed) spam link selling a currently unpublished book mentions a group called "The Pleasure Syndicate" Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The link to the to-be-published book is a legitimate link, not spam. It is a link to a noteworthy publishing house, Random House. See here: http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780307592163. The group only recently decided to collectively call themselves by the name The Pleasure Syndicate, which is why it is nowhere to be found--yet! They have written together for years, and now do so under the name The Pleasure Syndicate. Please let me know if you have any further questions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mberliet (talk • contribs) 22:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Since the link you provided is indeed selling the book mentioned, it qualifies as spam. Please give that link a read. Also, take a look at the notability guideline for groups, to determine whether "The Pleasure Syndicate" warrants its own article. However, since by the Original Poster's own admission that "The Pleasure Syndicate" is a non-notable group, this article may now qualify for speedy deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - as individuals rthey may be notable, but the group they have formed has yet to achieve notability. There are no reliable sources writing about them now.  If that changes in the future, then would be the time for an article. -- Whpq (talk) 18:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.