Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Obscure book with limited importance and notability. Fremte (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete A holdover from Wikipedia's days of taking all comers, this one was a stub made in 2005. Nobody wanted to help Wikipedia by expanding it.  No notability asserted fro this book.  Mandsford (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Jason Boyett as a plausible search term. Otherwise, nothing that can establish notability. MuZemike 19:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge I found quite numerous sources on google news. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep as a gsearch shows it go some attention. I wasn't able to find the gnews sources mentioned above. JJL (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Only six hits on google news, with only one that might be useful but hidden behind a paywall, and I see nothing useful in a wider google search. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to meet the notability guidelines. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.