Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The PokéDigi HQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per A7 by Nihonjoe. (non-admin closure) MrKIA11 (talk) 11:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

The PokéDigi HQ

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

nn defunct website, no assertion of notability, despite ample time from tagging Lalamore (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Lalamore  Chzz  ►  03:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable website, see section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Tckma (talk) 03:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I have been unable to find sources reliable sources after a number of different Google News Archive searches. Cunard (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - per nom - no assertion of notability.    7   talk &#124; &Delta; &#124;   07:02, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Marasmusine (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above The Weak Willed 12:52, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete A7, non notable website RadioFan (talk) 14:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete A7, does not assert notability in any way, nor does Google bring up anything on the name other than wiki mirrors. talking  birds  15:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Non-notable fansite.  The Flash  {talk} 02:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball speedy delete per A7 per above, absolutely no sources. This has sat around way too long. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.