Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pop Pop Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Not that made up. This appears to be a variation of the pediddle game me and my brothers played as kids. However, this variant is unverifiable so we can't have an article on it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

The Pop Pop Game

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not for things made up in one day.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:21, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note that my first prod was removed.  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  14:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There are no sources and no proof of notability. This should really be speedied. -- McDoob  AU  93  16:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, if you think you can stretch one of the reasons to cover this, be my guest ;)  Nolelover   Talk · Contribs  16:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. SL93 (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MADEUP, defefinitely. I agree that this should have been speedied, and think that anyone who wants to should do that at any time, I am sure there will be no one who argues that this is notable. Millermk90 (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Working off of WP:MADEUP as well.  Not much more can be said that doesn't duplicate what's above; this said, I'd like to call WP:SNOW at this point. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I second WP:SNOW. -- McDoob  AU  93  05:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't be too quick to use WP:MADEUP... oh wait, look at the creator's username. Speedy.  Phnom Pencil  talk contribs 02:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having insufficiently detailed coverage in independent third party sources. If such sources are found and integrated, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:14, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.