Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Porto Alegre Innovation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete (CSD G7) - author blanked the page. WjBscribe 19:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The Porto Alegre Innovation

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is clearly non-neutral in its point of view. It takes an advocacy tone toward its subject. The article contains considerable original research, is not encyclopedic in tone, is very lengthy, and frankly is likely beyond help from someone without a conflict of interest. The author maintains that "the world needs to know" about the process involved, but maintains a web site that is even more detailed; that web site is a more proper venue for this article than Wikipedia. Realkyhick 20:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete content and redirect page to Participatory budgeting - normally I'd vote to merge, but sifting through all the OR and other unencyclopedic verbiage is too herculean a task to expect of volunteer wikipedians. The creator has not contributed to any other articles, for what that's worth. Bobanny 21:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

NOTE: The author has read our comments, essentially agreed with them, and blanked the article (see the article talk page). Move for summary judgment, your honor. Realkyhick 08:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.