Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Power of the Nightstar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dragonland. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Power of the Nightstar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I deprodded to add a source, but I realised that for notability grounds the extra source I added wasn't very helpful for GNG (I saw the article's text reprinted on multiple news sites, raising concerns that it was derived from a press release disseminated to news outlets and thus failing independence). But instead of deletion like a prod would do, I prefer redirecting to the band. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree. Let's redirect until we find more reliable sourcing, probably when we get much closer to the album's release....SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 06:18, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Keep or merge - Keep, or merge this useful search term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 07:35, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That is two contradictory recommendations, and please clarify where it should be merged. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 *  Keep seems to be notable, but the page should be rewriteen and shortened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Juliorik (talk • contribs) 12:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain how it appears to be notable, given that neither of the current sources are reliable or demonstrate notability? And it doesn't need to be shortened, it needs to be expanded. Richard3120 (talk) 22:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the Metal Archives source which is certainly unreliable, but even keeping one source in the article is not enough for notability. This is why I suggested that, if expansion isn't possible, the article would be redirected until at least closer to the album's release, and maybe then we'll find more sources that are reliable....SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dragonland for now. Still fails WP:FUTUREALBUM per nom. A WP:BEFORE shows nothing beyond Chaoszine. SBKSPP (talk) 05:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Yeah, redirecting is probably the best solution. If we don't get any more response within the next two days, shall we do it until closer to or after the album's release?SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dragonland for now, with no prejudice against splitting it back out if the album gets coverage in reliable sources after its release. It was simply created WP:TOOSOON for there to be a possibility of it passing the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dragonland. Other than a single source, article fails WP:FUTUREALBUM. HorrorLover555 (talk) 05:25, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.