Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Preservationists Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

The Preservationists Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization. Most references cited do not mention this organization at all. The few that do are database listings or mentions in passing. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable organization. JDDJS (talk) 19:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

The references do mention the organization. They are articles in newspapers that discuss the encampment along with the preservation of the state marina. The Seabrook Wilson house along with the many other houses(Allen House Shrewsbury, Holmes-Hendrickson House) that have wiki pages were preserved by this organization. Evso727 (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Some of the references mention the organization, but only in passing. They are articles about things with which the Preservationists have been involved, and mention the organization, but they are not in-depth coverage of the organization. A non-profit organization without an identified website (none listed here, none listed anywhere else that I could find) would have a great deal of trouble rising to the level of activity to be considered notable. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:41, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment -- I have grave doubts as to its notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just not seeing enough to satisfy WP:ORG. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 16:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned, questionably notable and it's currently even nearly speedy material. SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.