Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pride Of Japan Is Tied Up In Giant Robots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

The Pride Of Japan Is Tied Up In Giant Robots

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't appear notable; importance tag removed without comment (hence no ProD). Sneftel 02:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Do I even have to explain why? YechielMan 03:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I do. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:NFT. Delete -- Selket Talk
 * Delete. The line "supergroup formed and terminated in 2006" says it all.  The bands these guys come from aren't even notable. --Mary quite contrary (hai?) 04:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Pride Of Wikipedia Is Tied Up In Giant Deletions of unsourced articles like this one. Delete. &mdash;Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-13 05:12Z 
 * Delete; unsourced, fails WP:MUSIC and WP:NFT. Sr13 (T|C) 07:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless properly sourced. Outstanding band name, though.  A  Train ''talk 13:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless expanded sufficiently to establish notability. This is one of my all-time favorite Wikipedia article titles, though. 23skidoo 15:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Formed and Terminated in one year? C'mon, how notable can it be? SpeakoutLOUD 20:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, can be mentioned in article on bandmember Schmidt. NawlinWiki 15:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Baristarim 04:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.