Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Primordial Tradition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Seraphim&hearts; Whipp  16:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

The Primordial Tradition

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A school of religious philosophy. Seems like a neologism and that the article written by Gwendolynt is just an advert for a journal edited by Gwendolyn Toynton. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep No doubt there is a significant element of COI and the article is in serious need of clean up, but |religioperennis.org, |rosicrucian.org and more suggest the article's subject goes beyond that of a minor magazine and is salvageable. Ben MacDuiTalk  /  Walk  08:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your suggestions Ben, I will tidy the article up. I have found the instructions on how to cite articles and the listed requirements for pages here rather vague and have having some trouble adding citations to the document. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwendolynt (talk • contribs) 03:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Refernce to myself that was attributing to the neologism problem has been removed - the rest of the article will be rewritten shortly Gwendolynt (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)GwendolynT Gwendolynt
 * Keep. At first it appeared a backdoor advertisement for a non-notable magazine, but even the laziest of Googling demonstrates the broad notability of this term and concept.  Even if the article is in horrendous shape now.  A good article could clearly evolve from this.  Ford MF (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - significant coverage in reliable sources. PhilKnight (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.