Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Prince Yung D


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete and salt. Flowerparty ☀ 23:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The Prince Yung D

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutely fails WP:MUSIC per searches of allmusic.com, billboard.com, google.com: No coverage in secondary sources or any charted singles/albums. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

--Andrewlp1991 (talk) 01:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also created by a WP:SPA whose sole purpose seems to be adding mentions of this non-notable rapper to wikipedia. Possible WP:COI issue based on name. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete it and Yung D discography. see also Articles for deletion/Yung D and it's large history of deletions. (edit conflict) Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that discography article. Thus, for the same reason, I am nominating that article for deletion:
 * Delete and salt all. Salting might seem extreme in this case, but if the creator had no problem continually recreating Yung D, s/he probably won't have trouble doing the same to these other articles. In addition, the external links and references on The Prince Yung D really all lead to his MySpace profile. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 20:09, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have also made a note about the situation here. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 20:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I rarely say to salt too, but I think metro might be right in this case. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete all the articles - definitely not notable--AssegaiAli (talk) 13:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - Since the article is being recreated by a promoter with a conflict of interest then by all means delete these articles and try to prevent them from being recreated. --  At am a chat 20:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.