Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Princess and the Frog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep, WP:CRYSTAL states "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred," and there is absolutely no question that this is the case here - the article has 18 references, and obviously the film would merit an article if it has already been released. --Stormie (talk) 06:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

The Princess and the Frog

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

delete wp:crystal Byon44 (talk) 20:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC) — Byon44 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - well sourced and well confirmed as a major release from a major studio. The controversy surrounding it certainly adds to that notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tony Fox. Georgia guy (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close. Only edits that the nom have made as of the time of my edit of this AFD show that this AFD is the ONLY edit the user has made.  WP:CRYSTAL has nothing to do with this, this is not crystalballery as this is well cited, in progress, and noted by Disney studios as in production.  I smell a WP:POINT. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply. There are plenty of reliable secondary sources about this film. And Variety has confirmed the release. All were referenced in the article prior to nom. --SmashvilleBONK! 22:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Smashville. DavidJ710| talk 22:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and suggest snowball closing it. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.