Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pritzker Estate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK. A valid rationale for deletion has not been advanced in the nomination, and no delete !votes are present. See WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid deletion rationales. North America1000 06:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

The Pritzker Estate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a private home and, unfortunately, this article is creating unwanted attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitwalked (talk • contribs) 20:21, March 28, 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Nominating account has zero other edits.  I have fixed the nomination, but I will note the the listed justification is not a valid reason to delete the article.  --Finngall talk  20:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep If you build a house this lavish and this big, the press does take notice. And because the press has taken notice, the article will be KEPT at Wikipedia. As the Wall Street Journal noted in an discussion of this "49,300-square-foot House that)  boasts amenities like a bowling alley, hairdressing area and gym," and other, similar very, very large mansions entitled Living Very Large, "One obvious drawback of building big: unwanted attention. 'nuff said.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 03:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The nomination advances no rationale for deletion and the coverage demonstrates WP:NOTABILITY beyond any reasonable doubt. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly large, prominent and significant enough for notability. The nominator's reasoning has no basis in any policy or guideline for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - No policy reason given for deletion. Septrillion (talk) 03:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.