Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Problem of the Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  InsertCleverPhraseHere  02:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

The Problem of the Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be a non-notable subject, cant find any references except amazon listings, etc, nothing suggests that it was discussed even narrowly by much of anyone. InsertCleverPhraseHere  19:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing any reviews, nor awards. Fails WP:NBOOK. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 20:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep, I found 3 reviews of the book in major peer-reviewed journals:
 * Atkinson, J. (2008). Robert W. McChesney. The Problem of the Media: U.S. Communication Politics in the 21st Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2004, 367 pp., ISBN 1583671056 (paperback). Mass Communication & Society, 11(1), 109-112.
 * Cumiskey, K. H. (2005). [The Problem of the Media]. College & Research Libraries, 66(3), 284-286.
 * Herrick, D. F. (2004). [The Problem of the Media]. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 949-951.
 * Moreover, as per WP:TEXTBOOKS the book is highly cited in the literature (~865 citation according to Google scholar), and is published by a major academic publisher NYU Press.
 * Yazan (talk) 22:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I have to say, good work indeed. I should have thought to look in academic sources for reviews, oh well, live and learn. Add these to the article and I'll happily withdraw the nomination.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  23:20, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Sorry, but it doesn't work that way, per WP:NEXIST. You've acknowledged that there's enough sourcing to establish notability. You're not in a position to hand out assignments. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I didn't intend to 'hand out assignments'. I'm withdrawing it either way, but was a bit busy when I commented above. Just a request, no need to be assume the worst.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  02:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.