Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The PropheC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

The PropheC

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prodded by someone else with explanation "The article was speedily deleted, restored, deleted, and restored again. This is the third version, as far as I know. The sources are still the same - insufficient" but prod was removed. Filing AFD on behalf of the prodder. DreamGuy (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and maybe salt after all the re-creations. None of the sources is significant. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as the author of misplaced . --Vejvančický (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for extremely poor source quality. All are useless, with the exception of the BBC, which barely mentions him. Quantumobserver (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - coverage in reliable source is lacking. - Whpq (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources - all are blogs, zines and websites. Someday, perhaps, but not now notable. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable autobiography/vanity piece lacking any reliable sources. لenna  vecia  18:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.