Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quarry at La Quinta (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  21:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

The Quarry at La Quinta
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The majority of this article is about where the course ranks out of other courses. The reliable sources found are about just the rank of the course and per WP:RANK - doesn't make it automatically notable. It was previously written like a promotion, mentioning all the amenities the course and club offer. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The sources cited are weak and provide no detail about the club; the mention of a couple of notable members does not help the club's notability. On a side note, the same seems to be true of most of the articles listed at Category:Golf clubs and courses in California; I suspect the majority of them would not survive an AfD discussion. --MelanieN (talk) 16:05, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:24, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. There does not appear to be much descriptive non-commercial content on this golf course beyond statistics and rankings. Without that, there is insufficient basis for a separate article. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.