Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen's Award for Enterprise: Sustainable Development (Environmental Achievement) (1997)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:04, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The Queen&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD, accidentally re-nominated for PROD. No indication of notability, no indication of who received the award. A similar article had the following comment added: ''Article is part of a large group of rapidly created and then largely abandoned articles. A first batch of 25 (the most egregious ones) was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen's Award for Enterprise: International Trade (Export) (1966). Most of the remaining articles are similar to the one nominated here. They are basically empty, unsourced, and incorrectly titled, so deleting them and restarting from scratch (if anyone is inclined to actually write a real article on these) is a much better option than trying to save these. The award (in 1996) was actually called "The Queen’s Award for Export Achievement". The disambiguation of the article title is completely unnecessary. The articles for 1976-1979, 1981-1982, 1984-2000 and 2004 are all equally empty as this one, despite all being prodded in January 2011 for this reason. The article creator removed the prods but didn't improve the articles. --Fram (talk) 14:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC) '' Wtshymanski (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The comment (by me) added by the nominator above gives my arguments. Fram (talk) 06:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as above,  No indication of notability, no indication of who received the award. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Close to speedy delete as no content. The Queen's award for enterprise itself may be notable, but it would make more sense to list winners in an article about that first, and consider a split later. I know a lot of Wikipedia pages can be considered works in progress, but a page that says nothing at all is one step too far. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator The article Queen's Awards for Enterprise covers these awards. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.