Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quentin Collection (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

The Quentin Collection
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Only sources are to PR Newswire or trivial. Small, non-notable strip mall. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:27, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7 - no attempt made to establish notabiliy. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete After looking for sources, I am unable to find enough coverage to satisfy the general notability criteria  Chzz  ►  09:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * speedy keep - what new argument is being presented that was not decided by the community last time? This reason for deletion is exactly the same as the last one, that closed as keep. No new argument/reasoning would mean that the last consensus is still consensus. Unless a new argument/reason is presented, speedy keep Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 21:16, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep is this part of an assault on Chicagomalls. Articles for deletion/Burr Ridge Village Center is similar to this.  I think these shopping centers are notable.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:20, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep- sources in the article establish enough notability per the GNG that there's no reason to delete. Umbralcorax (talk) 00:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.