Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deleted as a G11 for a MySpace page; recreated as a redirect. ⇨REDVEЯS 21:10, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

The Quest

 * — (View AfD)

WP:BOLLOCKS, MySpace fantasy garbage, only ghits for author or book are WP, nothing on Amazon, prod pulled with lame excuse made for why there's no web hits for a book that sold 27,000,000 copies. I would toss up for speedy if I thought the tag would stick long enough to get this trash zapped. Tubezone 19:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, although I did like both his parents were killed in a tragic accident involving fire and cliffs. Budgiekiller 20:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I would say keep if Budgiekiller haden't checked it out.Ganfon 20:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom. Obvious hoax.  Potential G1/G3? Tevildo 20:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Deletion per an obvious hoax. No author with this kind of following would have this little internet recognition regardless of his personal stance on technology. Cheers, Lankybugger 20:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom. Odd that the books are not available on the internet at the start of the article due to a moral stance, yet by the end they have a MySpace site where you can download them. Readro 00:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to quest (disambiguation). So this book has been selling 1,400 copies a day (and, apparently, around 4,000 a day in late 2001), yet nobody's even mentioned the name of the first volume online? No. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 05:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable. —ShadowHalo 06:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete content, purge history, and recreate as redirect to quest (disambiguation). Obvious hoax/joke. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 07:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.