Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quest for the Sybian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  03:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

The Quest for the Sybian

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This, too, seems to be related to some manga as a story explanation - I think this may run afoul of WP:FICTION but I'm not sure. Again, the IP user had posted without completing step two. Note, the author has been blocked for removing AFD tags.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 07:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * IP editor did follow the instructions and included a deletion rationale on the article talk page. "PROD removed by creator with no improvement to article. Fictional event with no indication of real-world notability." 98.248.33.198 (talk) 08:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable and I'm not even sure it isn't a hoax, given what a sybian actually is in the real world. Anyway googling the title of this article produces some very unedifying results. andy (talk) 10:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't even find any online references to the parent topic (the MAGCannon series): searching for (excluding DA because a user by that name generates a lot of false hits) turns up nothing at all. While this doesn't prove that it doesn't exist, it's a strong hint in that direction. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 20:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Possible hoax or from someone's dōjinshi. A Google search isn't even coming up with anything about the alleged manga, MAGCannon, other than being someone's internet handle. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Farix, it appears as there are no sources for "MAGCannon", notability cant be found, and it's being labeled as a hoax. I see no point in keeping these articles unless someone makes one hell of a good point to turn the tide. - Knowledgekid87 21:50, 4 October 2009 (AT)
 * Delete as hoax. It's no surprise to me that the editor who created the page has only edited this and the affiliated pages. Dandy Sephy (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be self-promotion for a non-existant work.  Clearly not notable. Edward321 (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like somebody decided to write his book right here on WIkipedia. Debresser (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.