Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quietus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The Quietus

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Failed to find any significant second or thrid party sources that coverage this subject neon white talk 06:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails all three criteria of WP:WEB. The article says "At the 2008 Record of the Day music industry awards, The Quietus was shortlisted for best website, and was voted best publication by UK students." I could find no mention of the latter (best publication), and being shortlisted for an award is not enough to make it notable. Anti  venin  06:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't shortlisted sometimes used interchangeably with nominated? - Mgm|(talk) 10:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak keep, there is independent, secondary-source coverage of the Metallica incident, but that may not indicate notability alone per WP:ONEEVENT. However, more than 50 articles currently link to the article, and based on the award nominations, it seems popular enough that we may be missing some coverage of the subject. So I recommend giving it the benefit of the doubt, and keep it with the "demand" that sources etc. be dug out. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 21:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I didnt consider that coverage to be that significant, the coverage is mostly about another subject and merely mentions the quietus in passing providing no real detail. I have searched and i can't find much, Popularity has never been used as criteria for notability. --neon white talk 03:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: trivial coverage. Non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 06:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

*Weak delete, per above, only one event. Deletion Mutation 17:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage. A-Kartoffel (talk) 07:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, there's third party coverage of the Metallica incident, but it's more about Metallica than this site, and it's a WP:ONEEVENT. Suggest that it's not quite notable enough yet, although that may change.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Blocked sockpuppet. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 20:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.