Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quill, Putney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:13, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

The Quill, Putney

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The place is notable – a coaching inn dating back to 1854. Details of the original construction appear in The Reporter and The Jurist and there is naturally further documention in more recent sources such as The Fascination of London and Putney & Roehampton Through Time.  Applicable policies include WP:ATD; WP:BITE; WP:PRESERVE, &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:41, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not see enough independent, reliable sources that discuss this pub. While it may be old, it does not meet WP:N. Angryapathy (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:ITSOLD is not a valid argument. Two sources in article are pub databases, not significant coverage, one does not even mention this pub, and one is mere passing mention. The above Jurist link is a primary source about a legal case, not significant coverage. Reywas92Talk 20:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per above,  Two sources in article are pub databases, . No notable coverage. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.