Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Radio Racket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete, CSD A7 and office decree on promotional articles. Teke ( talk ) 04:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The Radio Racket
''Warning to admins: This AfD is under attack, having been blanked by SPA and replaced with the text "All guests are notable if you have even the tinest clue about the broadcasting industry, and there are no shameless plugs on this website. Everything here is accurate and truthful. Retards." --Aaron 17:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)''

Non-notable web content. Not a speedy because of the guests section. Contested prod. MER-C 04:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * strong delete Shameless advertising. They've even put ads for their sponsors on! Yandman 08:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A7. I don't know why the guests section is an assertion of notability, since I don't think even one of the guests is themselves notable. -- Kicking222 12:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 per nom and Kicking222. --Aaron 17:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Tagged for Speedy Delete A7 Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 23:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Works for me. I hope the admin salts it. --Aaron 23:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I do have a clue about the broadcasting industry, (couple well placed friends in the local Entercom-owned stations, plus a dabbling into Internet Radio,) and just because you scored interviews with a handful or two of local DJ's, does not establish notability. I will commend you for one thing, most local DJ's I talk to around here have noted that their managers are starting to consider Internet Radio as competition, and would never sign off on an interview. But I digress... --Roninbk t c e # 01:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.