Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Radio Stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

The Radio Stars
Prodded by Skysmith: self-promotions - see the user name, but deprodded. The article itself happily provides grounds for its own deletion: They are currently unsigned, and at this point have released no material other than demos that appear on their Official website and MySpace page. Eusebeus 10:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, another NN myspace band inappropriately deprodded by chronic deprodder Kappa. Kuzaar 11:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the one sentence that's not there yet to Ross Tregenza per Kappa, then delete -- Hirudo 13:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. They haven't done a record, they haven't been signed and they don't even have a lineup yet?  Someone should explain to Kappa what WP:POINT is all about.  Sheesh.  RGTraynor 16:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not prepared to endorse the term "bad faith" but it should be noted that most (if not all) of Eusebus' recent AfD nominations are articles that were deprodded by Kappa. I certainly don't think Eusebus is putting a lot of thought or consideration into these nominations. Thatcher131 15:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm working to bring as many deprodded articles as I can. It is my bad that I have made it look like a targeted or bad faith campaign.  I simply started with the swath deprodded by Kappa (and hardly all of them, only those where I felt the prodder made a prima facie case for prodding that warranted fuller discussion). Eusebeus 15:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Beyond which, the sequence in the deletion chain is that after a prod tag is removed, the article should be sent up for AfD. Is there some reason doing so suddenly has become a problem?  It seems to me that if you disagree that such articles be sent up for AfD, the proper venue for discussion is the various Deletion-related Talk pages, not disrupting AfD itself.  WP:POINT.  RGTraynor 16:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BAND. "Currently in the process of forming" says it all. Sandstein 05:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.