Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rainwater LP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Rainwater LP

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article has no references at all. Minima c  94 ( talk ) 05:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 05:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @082  · 00:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect: IF and when released (for now, WP:CRYSTAL) redirect can be removed if becomes notable Alan  -  talk  23:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Has now been released, and has already been the subject of multiple non-trivial coverage in reliable sources: Allmusic Review, Aspen Times, and there's plenty more out there that can be used to source the article:, , , , , , .--Michig (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article is now in much better shape, if those that have already commented wouldn't mind taking another look. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect. When the article has enough references, it could be rewritten. Tbhotch (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Full-length album by an extremely popular musician, which was released today. No WP:CRYSTAL worries here, and obviously of encyclopedic merit. Chubbles (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article contains multiple reliable sources which provide significant coverage for this album; this satisfies WP:NALBUMS.  Gongshow  Talk 17:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.