Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Randazzo Sherman Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was early close as delete per WP:SNOW. --fvw *  21:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The Randazzo Sherman Theory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research, twice speedied. Delete and salt.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - can't find anything about this theory anywhere - Whpq (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - read the talk page; author admits it's new and non-notable work-in-progress. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * comment - Original research isn't one of the criteria for speedy deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * clarification - Speedy delete as advertising for new and non-notable work-in-progress -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourceable. - Eldereft (cont.) 18:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Incomprehensible, unreferenced, and will most likely remain unreferencable for the foreseeable future. Hqb (talk) 18:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unsourcable, fails WP:Notability, may be notable in future, but just isn't there now. Jo7hs2 (talk) 19:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * snowball delete not a chance in hell of this becoming a valid article, total bollocks. And please do salt the earth. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 20:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Original research is no grounds for speedy deletion. - Octanesque  (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.