Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Raven (interactive book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

The Raven (interactive book)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article added by User:Kenoiyan which seems to be an avid fan of The Raven. However this particular product isn't really notable. Travelbird (talk) 10:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * While the product may be less notable - since it's a relatively new product - I believe there's enough dependable sources and references to keep the article online as a work-in-progress (stud) article. I would appreciate some help with polishing this article, its information, and its sources. Thank you. ^^ Kenoiyan (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Note that the many references in the article are really uncritical directory listings of apps. -- Whpq (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Two reference links to critical reviews added (one academic). Kenoiyan (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't see how they meet the criteria for reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 02:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No reliable, third-party coverage. The sources in the article are essentially all first-party. The links that aren't the publisher's site are copies of a press release/blurb from the iOS app store. Two reviews from small blogs, which are not wp:RS. Searches turn up the same first-party stuff. » scoops “ 5x5  „ 01:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.