Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Re-Born


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The Re-Born
No sources to verify this album (per User:Discospinster). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, cant verify the claims, if they can, and can get some sources, i am ok for keeping it.Chris Kreider 01:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete When album is released, or at least reviews in a reliable source, then recreate the article. Until then, this is a total crystal ball article. --Jayron32 04:16, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Speculation, crystal-balling, unsourced, unverifiable... Hey, at least its fairly NPOV! ;-) EVula 05:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  as per nom, and wikipedia is not, of course, a crystal ball JoeSmack Talk (p-review!) 19:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep with tag saying sources needed. This could be a decent article; it just needs some sources. Justinpwilsonadvocate 16:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.