Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Estate Wiki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 13:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The Real Estate Wiki

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wiki with no notable coverage either in article or in searches for sources meeting WP:RS. Both references in article are from press releases and technewsworld article only mentions the wiki in passing. Flowanda | Talk 03:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  00:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Clearly Non-notable.  Xihr  00:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Boston (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The Inman News story + this ecommerce times story go far enough to establish notability, by being reliable, nontrivial sources. Wily D 12:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete is mostly about the real estate wiki on Wikia; the only mention of The Real Estate Wiki is a link in the second paragraph, a trivial mention.  is a press release, and not a third-party source.  is a news announcement about the launching of the website. It's a pay site, but the first 2 paragraphs read like a press release. No third-party, non-trivial, reliable sources found. -Atmoz (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful site with a substantial amount of info; a Wikipedia article is justified in spite of weak external coverage. Looie496 (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak external coverage is a reason for a Delete Secret account 22:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.