Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Oh My


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  16:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The Real Oh My

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Band of dubious notability, unsourced, article not edited since 2005.  Sandstein  12:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Seems to pass WP:MUSIC. A redirect would probably be more appropriate, but with three notable members, who to redirect to? As for sources, could be deleted for failing WP:V. Nouse4aname (talk) 12:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into Mike Watt (who does not even have the band in the associated acts section of his Infobox), Nels Cline, and Kevin Fitzgerald. Nels's page and Kevin's page both do not mention The Real Oh My at all, so the redirect should probably point at Mike Watt. While it does pass the sixth criteria in WP:BAND, it fails every single other one and therefore would not be notable. D ARTH P ANDA talk 00:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Per the guidelines, the band only needs to satisfy one of the criteria to be notable. - Mgm|(talk) 10:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:14, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Redirect not strictly possible due to the three parties involved. Nothing verifiable to merge due to lack of reliable, third-party, sources.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 03:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nouse4aname assessment of MUSIC#C6. I believe this is a common sense exception to the rule (to merge). With three possible merge targets, I believe it is best to leave the entry where it is and point at it from all the member's pages.- Mgm|(talk) 10:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.