Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Oh My (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the articles meets WP:NBAND and is no longer completely unsourced Davewild (talk) 21:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

The Real Oh My
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article I couldn't quite make out of. It was up for a AFD in 2008 with 1 merge, 1 delete and 1 keep. It has apparently been inactive and nothing has ever happened with it either. Wgolf (talk) 01:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  01:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  02:46, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Pinging, , , , , , who participated in last AfD. Boleyn (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NBAND #6:Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles. Boleyn (talk) 12:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely unsourced, per WP:V, and apparently nobody cares enough to find sources. We can't even verify whether this alleged ensemble exists.  Sandstein   12:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment It was unsourced, but isn't now - it was just neglected. I'm not sure the references I've now added would take it over WP:GNG, but they verify that it meets WP:NBAND #6. Boleyn (talk) 12:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. If this was a band with one notable member we'd probably merge it to that article. Having two notable members makes it no more suitable for deletion and there's no single target to merge to. --Michig (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  01:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:54, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.