Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rebellion Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 00:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

The Rebellion Party
I don't think this is quite a speedy candidate. It could be expanded into an article, perhaps. For right now, I recomend deletion as unencylopedic. brenneman (t) (c) 22:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * -Keep Hello, I am the author of this article and I would like to thank the Wikipedia community for this opportunity to defend my contribution.

I was thinking the idea of Wikipedia (please, correct me if I am wrong) is that if one member goes to the trouble of writing about something he/she deems as important and adds that information to Wikipedia in Good Faith, then it is worth having until proven other wise. Since this is a real political movement, which has the ability of becoming an elected representative of the people, it is of great importance to many people to know about this party and that it is actively looking for members from the general public.

The point that I would like to make in defense of the article is that, thankfully, "unencyclopedic" is not an official policy and therefore not a valid argument for deletion. It is an argument for discussion, which I am more then happy to do. Xwire 21:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * A minimum requirement is verifiablility from reliable sources. - brenneman (t) (c)  22:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

All I can say is that myself and other members are the only reliable sources on this topic. We are hoping that you would consider us to be the most important source in the event of vandals. Feel free to contact us if you need further evidence. .Xwire 23:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, Wikipedia is not the place to announce the formation of a new (formed in December 2005) political party which doesn't even have the required number of members or signatures yet. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

At what point does a political party become old enough? You don't know how many members the party has because you are not a member. Xwire 23:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Sjakkalle. I wish Xwire all the best with his party. Stifle 17:03, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, er... The best to you as well. Xwire 23:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable. The time when it will get an entry is when many others are writing about it.  Obina 22:32, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.